Marion's rebuttal to Martina Navratilova.
www.observer.com/2007/bartoli-navratilova-enough-already

Question and Answer session with Marion.
www.tennisnews.com/exclusive.php?pID=21809

MY COMMENT

If Marion had defeated Justine in the 2nd or 3rd round, and was knocked out in the following round.. then ok, i'd be prepared to accept that people have grounds for calling Marion's Wimbledon a fluke, like when Craybas knocked out Serena.

However, winning 6 out of 7 matches can't be explained away as a fluke. There wasnt a bad player among those she defeated. Even Flavia Penetta whom she defeated in 1st round, has been to the 3rd and 4th round of Wimbledon a few times.

The 'experts' should concede they got it wrong. Spare their own blushes by being more economical with their tongues. If Martina or anyone else dont have anything kind or positive to say then why say anything at all?

And here we are post-Wimbledon, still the disrespectful, unfair, and pejorative remarks abound.. Such as those made by messrs Navratilova, Austin, Barker, and McEnroe... Yes, the WTA legal firm! The enforcers of tennis orthodoxy!

Marion is a very misunderstood player. But the results speak for themselves. Her ranking has improved every year since turning professional aged 16. If the experts dont get what Marion's about then they should at least get with the results.

EDITED 10/14/07